<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CAUGHT IN THE WEB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>a blog on media, culture, technology and other things by sam han</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Nam June Paik by Michael</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/nam-june-paik/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=965#comment-450</guid>
		<description>&quot;Video artist&quot;? Like Knox Harrington?

I wanna be a video artist when I grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Video artist&#8221;? Like Knox Harrington?</p>
<p>I wanna be a video artist when I grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Paper #5: Spatial Secularization: A Comparative Analysis of Religious Space in Mircea Eliade and Henri Lefebvre by Rushhumble</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/working-paper-5-spatial-secularization-a-comparative-analysis-of-religious-space-in-mircea-eliade-and-henri-lefebvre/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Rushhumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=960#comment-449</guid>
		<description>I printed to PDF, so I could work my way through this piece.  Decidedly heavy-duty, and I&#039;d like to invite you to peruse my laughably lighter post &quot;The Harm That they Do&quot; for a little breather.  http://2bites.com/2009/12/03/the-harm-that-they-do/
Sincerely,  Rushhumble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I printed to PDF, so I could work my way through this piece.  Decidedly heavy-duty, and I&#8217;d like to invite you to peruse my laughably lighter post &#8220;The Harm That they Do&#8221; for a little breather.  <a href="http://2bites.com/2009/12/03/the-harm-that-they-do/" rel="nofollow">http://2bites.com/2009/12/03/the-harm-that-they-do/</a><br />
Sincerely,  Rushhumble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weighing in on Vazquez vs. Frere-Jones by Outside of Popeyes eating chicken and fries &#171; Queering the Dinosaur Nation</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/weighing-in-on-vazquez-vs-frere-jones/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside of Popeyes eating chicken and fries &#171; Queering the Dinosaur Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-444</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weighing in on Vazquez vs. Frere-Jones by SH</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/weighing-in-on-vazquez-vs-frere-jones/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>SH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Sham, 

This ish is hilarious man. My God, it&#039;s Pavlovian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sham, </p>
<p>This ish is hilarious man. My God, it&#8217;s Pavlovian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weighing in on Vazquez vs. Frere-Jones by victor</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/weighing-in-on-vazquez-vs-frere-jones/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-439</guid>
		<description>no offense taken, all solid points.

while sfj&#039;s (admittedly mild relative to many other critics&#039;) paternalism did irk me i didn&#039;t mean for it to come off as the crux of my argument.  i left it at the beginning of my response because it was literally the first thing i wrote in response to the first thing i read and on the real it was mostly for the &quot;go in&quot; factor, on some &quot;oh i guess they want us to browbeat homeboy a little bit,&quot; which, now that you mention it, is def on some ressentiment shit and on some &quot;white masks&quot; type expectation fulfillment.  hima even pointed out that i was on some nominal caveat shit and i was like &quot;i know, but mine doesn&#039;t undermine my argument as much as his does&quot; which i actually do think is true *to an extent* but is lazy. 

if i could write it again, i would probably just stick to pointing out the inconsistencies of dude&#039;s terms, say &quot;everything is everything&quot; or &quot;who cares?&quot; and be out.

also to clarify, i guess i could have made it more clear that the &quot;genealogical statements&quot; i made were not meant to serve as one cohesive time line that i personally subscribe to so much as any number of diverse (conflicting, even) things you could call rap &quot;depending on how one chooses one&#039;s criteria.&quot;  similarly, i don&#039;t think i made it clear enough when i used andre, tip and common as arguable precedents for blueprint 3 and 808s, that this is only if we choose to accept sfj&#039;s a priori argument that there is even a genre that exists to &quot;bend.&quot; i guess i indulged in arguing on his terms for the sport of it cause honestly it&#039;s kind of fun but end of the day foucault is my real wifey. 

so yeah, on the whole i think i was doing more work to illustrate inconsistencies in sfj&#039;s piece then to present my own alternative means of ordering things, but this is mostly to do with my reluctance to see the importance of tasks like that in the first place. in short, i did it for the pr. that said, i could have cut out like three paragraphs and it would have been sharper and honestly more, well... honest.

still, thanks for keeping it extra extra trill as per usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no offense taken, all solid points.</p>
<p>while sfj&#8217;s (admittedly mild relative to many other critics&#8217;) paternalism did irk me i didn&#8217;t mean for it to come off as the crux of my argument.  i left it at the beginning of my response because it was literally the first thing i wrote in response to the first thing i read and on the real it was mostly for the &#8220;go in&#8221; factor, on some &#8220;oh i guess they want us to browbeat homeboy a little bit,&#8221; which, now that you mention it, is def on some ressentiment shit and on some &#8220;white masks&#8221; type expectation fulfillment.  hima even pointed out that i was on some nominal caveat shit and i was like &#8220;i know, but mine doesn&#8217;t undermine my argument as much as his does&#8221; which i actually do think is true *to an extent* but is lazy. </p>
<p>if i could write it again, i would probably just stick to pointing out the inconsistencies of dude&#8217;s terms, say &#8220;everything is everything&#8221; or &#8220;who cares?&#8221; and be out.</p>
<p>also to clarify, i guess i could have made it more clear that the &#8220;genealogical statements&#8221; i made were not meant to serve as one cohesive time line that i personally subscribe to so much as any number of diverse (conflicting, even) things you could call rap &#8220;depending on how one chooses one&#8217;s criteria.&#8221;  similarly, i don&#8217;t think i made it clear enough when i used andre, tip and common as arguable precedents for blueprint 3 and 808s, that this is only if we choose to accept sfj&#8217;s a priori argument that there is even a genre that exists to &#8220;bend.&#8221; i guess i indulged in arguing on his terms for the sport of it cause honestly it&#8217;s kind of fun but end of the day foucault is my real wifey. </p>
<p>so yeah, on the whole i think i was doing more work to illustrate inconsistencies in sfj&#8217;s piece then to present my own alternative means of ordering things, but this is mostly to do with my reluctance to see the importance of tasks like that in the first place. in short, i did it for the pr. that said, i could have cut out like three paragraphs and it would have been sharper and honestly more, well&#8230; honest.</p>
<p>still, thanks for keeping it extra extra trill as per usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weighing in on Vazquez vs. Frere-Jones by Michael</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/weighing-in-on-vazquez-vs-frere-jones/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Allow me to kick off this here intellectual comment space by seriously lowering the bar. Re. white ppl, this baby is so white that it already loves Fleetwood Mac:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTpegI5Li-o&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;]

(sorry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to kick off this here intellectual comment space by seriously lowering the bar. Re. white ppl, this baby is so white that it already loves Fleetwood Mac:<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/nam-june-paik/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/fTpegI5Li-o/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>(sorry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Playbor? by Michael</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/digital-playbor/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=940#comment-436</guid>
		<description>hahahahahaha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udGzLXF5NLY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahahahaha</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/nam-june-paik/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/udGzLXF5NLY/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Playbor? by SH</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/digital-playbor/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>SH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=940#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Oh, you mean this guy? 

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:Vto6kjhvmwHOJM:http://i.bnet.com/blogs/mens-wearhouse.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you mean this guy? </p>
<p><a href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:Vto6kjhvmwHOJM:http://i.bnet.com/blogs/mens-wearhouse.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:Vto6kjhvmwHOJM:http://i.bnet.com/blogs/mens-wearhouse.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Playbor? by Michael</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/digital-playbor/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=940#comment-434</guid>
		<description>That lineup does sound &#039;ridiculous&#039;. Bet the afterparty&#039;s gonna be poppin like whoa.

That Carpignano dude reminds me of someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That lineup does sound &#8216;ridiculous&#8217;. Bet the afterparty&#8217;s gonna be poppin like whoa.</p>
<p>That Carpignano dude reminds me of someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Utter self-promotion: My new edited book is OUT by Jenn</title>
		<link>http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/utter-self-promotion-my-new-edited-book-is-out/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caughtintheweb.wordpress.com/?p=931#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
